The PDF was saved in your download folder or opened in a new tab in your browser. You can find the download folder on your drive or in the browser bar of Firefox and Safari at the top right next to the arrow icon.
Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are rare, clonal diseases of the hematopoietic stem cell that share many common features, which is why they are often difficult to distinguish from one another, especially in the early stages, and can also merge in individual cases. The annual incidence of all MPN subtypes combined is approximately 6/100,000 (Swerdlow et al. 2017). MPNs usually affect people of older age with a median of 60-65 years (Barbui 2012). Characteristic of MPN is hypercellularity of the bone marrow, specifically the myeloid cell series, and increased numbers of erythrocytes, granulocytes, and/or platelets in the peripheral blood, depending on the entity (Haferlach et al. 2008, Swerdlow et al. 2017).
MPNs are basically divided into chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) as BCR-ABL1-positive MPNs and BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (Haferlach et al. 2008, Swerdlow et al. 2017).
Table 1: MPN WHO classification 2017. (Swerdlow et al., 2017)
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN)
Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)
Chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL)
Polyzythemia vera (PV)
Primary myelofibrosis (PMF)
|Essential thrombocythemia (ET)|
|Chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified (CEL, NOS)|
|MPN, unclassifiable (MPN-U)|
The three entities polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) are often also grouped under the term "classic" BCR-ABL1-negative MPN. Primary myelofibrosis was also previously referred to as osteomyelofibrosis (OMF) or chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis (CIMF).
In contrast to CML, which is clearly defined by the presence of a BCR-ABL1 rearrangement or a Philadelphia chromosome, BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative disorders are a very heterogeneous group of diseases from a cytogenetic and molecular genetic perspective. This is mainly reflected in the frequency and nature of clonal chromosomal abnormalities as well as molecular genetic abnormalities.
Cytomorphologic assessment in MPNs involves cellularity in the whole as well as in individual hematopoietic series. It is also important to determine the proportion of blasts in the blood and bone marrow. If fibrosis of the bone marrow exists, e.g. in primary myelofibrosis (PMF), the cytomorphological assessability of the preparations is often limited (punctio sicca).
In all cases, the histology is decisive for the assessment of the degree of fibrosis and the bone marrow architecture, which should always be performed in the case of a suspected or confirmed MPN.
Chromosomal abnormalities occurring in MPN present very heterogeneously. Chromosomal abnormalities are most frequently observed in PMF (40%), followed by PV (35%), whereas abnormalities in ET are rarely found (~ 3%). Over 80% of chromosomal abnormalities in MPN are unbalanced alterations (Bacher et al. 2005).
Across MPNs, trisomy 8, trisomy 9, and trisomy 9p are found. Deletion in the long arm of a chromosome 20 (del(20q)) also represents a typical abnormalities. Other cytogenetic abnormalities in MPN include loss of the Y chromosome (-Y) and gain of a chromosome 19 (+19) (Bacher et al. 2005, Gangat et al. 2008, Haferlach et al. 2008, Sever et al. 2009, Swerdlow et al. 2017, Tefferi et al. 2018).
Trisomy 8 (+8) represents the most common clonal change (~20% of PV cases, 10% of PMF cases) (Haferlach et al. 2008). However, the presence of trisomy 8 allows only limited conclusions about the type of disease, as it also occurs in MDS and AML. Other abnormalities in MPN affect chromosome 7 (-7, -7q) and often occur in combination with JAK2 mutations (Dunlap et al. 2011).
Deletions in the long arm of a chromosome 13 (del(13q)) and gain of material of the long arm of chromosome 1 (+1q) also occur in PV and PMF (Bacher et al. 2005). In PMF, this change affects 6 and 10% of cases, respectively (Bacher et al. 2005). Deletions in the short arm of chromosome 12 (del(12p)) are also observed in PV and PMF.
Trisomy 9 or trisomy 9p is one of the most common cytogenetic abnormalities in PV and is observed in approximately 10% of cases (Haferlach et al. 2008). It is virtually always associated with a homozygous V617F mutation in the JAK2 gene.
Table 2: Overview of chromosomal abnormalities in classical BCR-ABL1-negative MPN (Bacher et al. 2005, Gangat et al. 2008, Haferlach et al. 2008, Sever et al. 2009, Swerdlow et al. 2017, Tefferi et al. 2018)
Im Rahmen der Diagnostik der MPN ist die FISH-Analyse überwiegend als ergänzende Methode zur klassischen Chromosomenanalyse zu sehen. Sie wird gezielt zur Beantwortung bestimmter Fragestellungen eingesetzt. Zum Ausschluss eines BCR-ABL1-Rearrangements als sichere Abgrenzung gegenüber der CML sollte bei Verdacht auf MPN immer eine FISH-Analyse und/oder eine PCR durchgeführt werden, da auch beim Fehlen einer Philadelphia-Translokation in der Chromosomenanalyse ein kryptisches BCR-ABL1-Rearrangement vorliegen kann (sog. Philadelphia-negative BCR-ABL1-positive CML).
Mittels eines FISH-“Screenings“ an Interphase-Kernen würde nur ein Bruchteil der bei der MPN möglichen Aberrationen erfasst werden. Daher kann eine FISH die klassische Chromosomenanalyse nicht ersetzen.
Today, molecular genetics is the most important tool in MPN diagnostics. It is used to exclude a BCR-ABL1 rearrangement and is also used to differentiate an MPN from a reactive alteration and to diagnose progression. For this purpose, a large number of mutations (especially JAK2 V617F, MPL, CALR) have been identified in the last ten years (see Table 3).
JAK2 Exon 12
In familial MPN, mutations in the VHL, EPOR, EPAS1 and EGLN1 genes can occasionally be found. These mutations are very rare and should be investigated when all other markers are negative, the patient is very young, and there is a positive family history (Jones & Cross 2013, Rumi & Cazzola 2017, McMullin 2019).
JAK2 V617F mutation plays central role in MPN diagnostics
The V617F mutation in exon 14 of the JAK2 gene (Janus kinase 2) has assumed a central role in the diagnosis of MPN. This involves an exchange of guanidine for thymidine at nucleotide position 1849, resulting in a substitution of the amino acid valine at position p.617 for phenylalanine (Baxter et al. 2005, James et al. 2005, Kralovics et al. 2005, Levine et al. 2005, Bench et al. 2013, Vainchenker & Kralovics 2017). This mutation, resulting in increased kinase activity, is found in approximately 96% of all PV patients. V617F mutations are also found in approximately 50% of all ET and PMF. In general, advanced disease appears to be associated with a higher mutation burden (i.e., mutation/wild-type ratio), with the highest mutation burdens found in PV and the lowest in ET. Homozygous V617F mutations arising from uniparental disomy are more common in PV than in ET (Stein et al. 2015).
JAK2 Exon 12-Mutationen bei V617F-negativer PV
Bei etwa 80% aller V617F-negativen PV-Fälle finden sich Mutationen im Exon 12 des JAK2-Gens, die im Gegensatz zur V617F-Mutation heterogen sein können (Langabeer et al. 2015, Stein et al. 2015, Geyer & Orazi 2016). Diese Mutationen sind meistens Insertionen oder Deletionen im Bereich der Aminosäurereste 533-547 (Langabeer et al. 2015), wobei seltener auch Punktmutationen (Missensemutationen) oder größere Insertionen vorliegen können (Butcher et al. 2008, Pietra et al. 2008, Langabeer et al. 2015, Vainchenker & Kralovics 2017). Über die Hälfte aller Patienten mit JAK2 Exon 12-Mutationen weisen nicht den klassischen PV-Phänotyp auf, sondern imponieren als isolierte Erythrozytosen (Pardanani et al. 2007, Scott et al. 2007, Williams et al. 2007, Pietra et al. 2008, Passamonti et al. 2011). Die klinische Symptomatik erscheint weniger ausgeprägt, jedoch liegen aufgrund der insgesamt geringen Häufigkeit bisher keine sicheren Daten zur Prognose vor.
MPL and CALR mutations in JAK2 V617F-negative PMF or ET
The MPL gene encodes the thrombopoietin receptor and is a frequently mutated gene in JAK2 V617F-negative patients, although the relative mutation frequency varies widely between different studies. Up to 16% have been described in PMF patients and 0-15% in ET patients (Levine & Wernig 2006, Pikman et al. 2006, Beer et al. 2008, Pietra et al. 2011). Mutations in the MPL gene are almost always located at position W515, resulting in an exchange of the tryptophan for leucine (W515L), lysine (W515K) or more rarely arginine (W515R), serine (W515S) or alanine (W515A). Rarely, S505N mutations are also found (Pardanani et al. 2006, Pikman et al. 2006, Tefferi 2008, Langabeer et al. 2015). These mutations also lead to constitutive activation of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway.
Overall survival of JAK2 V617F and MPL W515 mutated patients does not differ (Klampfl et al. 2013). Patients with MPL mutation tend to show lower hemoglobin levels. ET patients with MPL mutation also show higher platelet levels, isolated megakaryocyte proliferation, and higher serum erythropoietin levels compared to patients with JAK2 V617F mutation (Langabeer et al. 2015). Analogous to the JAK2 V617F mutation, MPL mutations generally have a higher mutational burden in PMF than in ET and may increase with disease progression (Rumi et al. 2013).
Mutations in the calreticulin gene (CALR) are found in up to 70% of patients with essential thrombocythemia and in 56-88% with myelofibrosis in
TET2 mutations occur in MPN independent of JAK2 mutation status
Mutations in the TET2 gene, a member of the TET oncogene family, have also been described in 10-20% of each PV and PMF and approximately 5% of ET, which can occur independently of JAK2 mutation status (Langabeer et al. 2015). TET2 mutations are found upstream or downstream of JAK2 mutations in the developmental sequence and represent early or even late events in transformation in MPN. Because TET2 mutations are found in all MPN types, they do not allow discrimination between entities. However, they can be helpful in differentiating clonal disease from reactive transformation (Stein et al. 2015).
In addition to increased age, leukocytosis, and thrombosis (Gangat et al. 2011, Barbui et al. 2018), in general, the detection of chromosomal abnormalities at diagnosis of an MPN seems to be associated with a less favorable prognosis. The presence of complex karyotypes during the course of an MPN increases the likelihood of transition to blast crisis (Haferlach et al. 2008). SNP array analyses showed clustered deletions of the genes ETV6 (Chr. 12), TP53 (Chr. 17), or RUNX1 (Chr. 21) in blast crisis (Thoennissen et al. 2010).
Gene mutations influence the risk profile of "classic" BCR-ABL1-negative MPN
The JAK2 V617F mutation is the most common mutation in MPN. PV is almost always associated with this mutation (97%). In addition to the JAK2 V617F mutation, mutations in the CALR (20-25%) and MPL (3-8%) genes often occur in ET and PMF. These mutations are among the driver mutations in MPN, but do not allow a specific diagnosis due to their cross-entity occurrence.
81% of PMF patients, 53% of PV patients, and 53% of ET patients show additional mutations (non-driver mutations) in addition to the driver mutations, including the genes SRSF2, ASXL1, IDH2, EZH2, TP53, U2AF1, CBL, SF3B1 and SH2B3 (see also Fig. 1). IDH2 mutations are classified as a risk factor in all three classic BCR-ABL1-negative MPNs (Tefferi et al. 2016, Tefferi & Vannucchi 2017). Furthermore, each of the three entities has an entity-specific risk profile, an overview is given in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Recurrent non-driver gene mutations in PMF, PV and ET with prognostic impact (adapted from Tefferi et al. 2016, Tefferi & Vannucchi 2017).
Recurrent mutations in PMF patients frequently affect the SRSF2, ASXL1, IDH2, EZH2, TP53, U2AF1, and CBL genes. These gene mutations are prognostically significant and the presence of two or more mutations worsens prognosis (Guglielmelli et al. 2011, Vannucchi et al. 2013, Guglielmelli et al. 2014, Tefferi et al. 2014).
In PV patients, recurrent mutations include SRSF2, ASXL1 and IDH2, each of which is associated with decreased overall survival and myelofibrosis/leukemia-free survival (Tefferi et al. 2016, Tefferi & Vannucchi 2017).
Approximately 15% of ET patients have a mutation in at least one of the IDH2, EZH2, TP53, U2AF1, SF2B1 or SH2B3 genes. These mutations are considered risk factors and are associated with reduced overall survival or myelofibrosis- and leukemia-free survival (Tefferi & Vannucchi 2017).
For a detailed insight into the individual MPNs and their genetic risk profiles, please refer to the infotexts of the respective entity:
You can find the corresponding references here:https://www.mll.com/en/diagnostic-offer/myelodysplastic-syndrome-mds/myeloproliferative-neoplasm-mpn/bcr-abl1-negative-myeloproliferative-neoplasms.html#referenzen
Bacher U et al. Conventional cytogenetics of myeloproliferative diseases other than CML contribute valid information. Ann Hematol 2005;84(4):250-257.
Barbui T. How to manage children and young adults with myeloproliferative neoplasms. Leukemia 2012;26(7):1452-1457.
Barbui T et al. Philadelphia chromosome-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: revised management recommendations from European LeukemiaNet. Leukemia 2018;32(5):1057-1069.
Baxter EJ et al. Acquired mutation of the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in human myeloproliferative disorders. Lancet 2005;365(9464):1054-1061.
Beer PA et al. MPL mutations in myeloproliferative disorders: analysis of the PT-1 cohort. Blood 2008;112(1):141-149.
Bench AJ et al. Molecular diagnosis of the myeloproliferative neoplasms: UK guidelines for the detection of JAK2 V617F and other relevant mutations. Br J Haematol 2013;160(1):25-34.
Butcher CM et al. Two novel JAK2 exon 12 mutations in JAK2V617F-negative polycythaemia vera patients. Leukemia 2008;22(4):870-873.
Dunlap J et al. Association of JAK2 Mutation Status and Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms and Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. Am J Clin Pathol 2011;135(5):709-719.
Gangat N et al. DIPSS plus: a refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status. J Clin Oncol 2011;29(4):392-397.
Gangat N et al. Cytogenetic studies at diagnosis in polycythemia vera: clinical and JAK2V617F allele burden correlates. Eur J Haematol 2008;80(3):197-200.
Geyer JT, Orazi A. Myeloproliferative neoplasms (BCR-ABL1 negative) and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms: current diagnostic principles and upcoming updates. Int J Lab Hematol 2016;38 Suppl 1(12-19.
Guglielmelli P et al. EZH2 mutational status predicts poor survival in myelofibrosis. Blood 2011;118(19):5227-5234.
Guglielmelli P et al. The number of prognostically detrimental mutations and prognosis in primary myelofibrosis: an international study of 797 patients. Leukemia 2014;28(9):1804-1810.
Haferlach T et al. The diagnosis of BCR/ABL-negative chronic myeloproliferative diseases (CMPD): a comprehensive approach based on morphology, cytogenetics, and molecular markers. Ann Hematol 2008;87(1):1-10.
James C et al. A unique clonal JAK2 mutation leading to constitutive signalling causes polycythaemia vera. Nature 2005;434(7037):1144-1148.
Jones AV, Cross NC. Inherited predisposition to myeloproliferative neoplasms. Ther Adv Hematol 2013;4(4):237-253.
Klampfl T et al. Somatic mutations of calreticulin in myeloproliferative neoplasms. N Engl J Med 2013;369(25):2379-2390.
Kralovics R et al. A gain-of-function mutation of JAK2 in myeloproliferative disorders. N. Engl. J. Med 2005;352(17):1779-1790.
Langabeer SE et al. Molecular diagnostics of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Eur. J Haematol 2015;95(4):270-279.
Levine RL et al. Activating mutation in the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and myeloid metaplasia with myelofibrosis. Cancer Cell 2005;7(4):387-397.
Levine RL, Wernig G. Role of JAK-STAT signaling in the pathogenesis of myeloproliferative disorders. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2006;233-239, 510.
McMullin MF. Diagnostic workflow for hereditary erythrocytosis and thrombocytosis. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2019;2019(1):391-396.
Nangalia J et al. Somatic CALR mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms with nonmutated JAK2. N Engl J Med 2013;369(25):2391-2405.
Pardanani A et al. Prevalence and clinicopathologic correlates of JAK2 exon 12 mutations in JAK2V617F-negative polycythemia vera. Leukemia 2007;21(9):1960-1963.
Pardanani AD et al. MPL515 mutations in myeloproliferative and other myeloid disorders: a study of 1182 patients. Blood 2006;108(10):3472-3476.
Passamonti F et al. Molecular and clinical features of the myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with JAK2 exon 12 mutations. Blood 2011;117(10):2813-2816.
Pietra D et al. Deep sequencing reveals double mutations in cis of MPL exon 10 in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Haematologica 2011;96(4):607-611.
Pietra D et al. Somatic mutations of JAK2 exon 12 in patients with JAK2 (V617F)-negative myeloproliferative disorders. Blood 2008;111(3):1686-1689.
Pikman Y et al. MPLW515L is a novel somatic activating mutation in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. PLoS Med 2006;3(7):e270.
Rumi E, Cazzola M. Advances in understanding the pathogenesis of familial myeloproliferative neoplasms. Br J Haematol 2017;178(5):689-698.
Rumi E et al. Acquired copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity of chromosome 1p as a molecular event associated with marrow fibrosis in MPL-mutated myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood 2013;121(21):4388-4395.
Scott LM et al. JAK2 exon 12 mutations in polycythemia vera and idiopathic erythrocytosis. N. Engl. J Med 2007;356(5):459-468.
Sever M et al. Cytogenetic abnormalities in essential thrombocythemia at presentation and transformation. Int J Hematol 2009;90(4):522-525.
Stein BL et al. Polycythemia Vera: An Appraisal of the Biology and Management 10 Years After the Discovery of JAK2 V617F. J Clin Oncol 2015;33(33):3953-3960.
Swerdlow SH et al. WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) 2017; 4th.
Tefferi A. The history of myeloproliferative disorders: before and after Dameshek. Leukemia 2008;22(1):3-13.
Tefferi A. Primary myelofibrosis: 2019 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management. Am J Hematol 2018;93(12):1551-1560.
Tefferi A et al. CALR and ASXL1 mutations-based molecular prognostication in primary myelofibrosis: an international study of 570 patients. Leukemia 2014;28(7):1494-1500.
Tefferi A et al. Targeted deep sequencing in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. Blood Adv 2016;1(1):21-30.
Tefferi A et al. Revised cytogenetic risk stratification in primary myelofibrosis: analysis based on 1002 informative patients. Leukemia 2018;32(5):1189-1199.
Tefferi A, Vannucchi AM. Genetic Risk Assessment in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. Mayo Clin Proc 2017;92(8):1283-1290.
Thoennissen NH et al. Prevalence and prognostic impact of allelic imbalances associated with leukemic transformation of Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood 2010;115(14):2882-2890.
Vainchenker W, Kralovics R. Genetic basis and molecular pathophysiology of classical myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood 2017;129(6):667-679.
Vannucchi AM et al. Mutations and prognosis in primary myelofibrosis. Leukemia 2013;27(9):1861-1869.
Williams DM et al. Phenotypic variations and new mutations in JAK2 V617F-negative polycythemia vera, erythrocytosis, and idiopathic myelofibrosis. Exp Hematol 2007;35(11):1641-1646.